Mid-South Investments, Inc. v. Statesville Flying Service, Inc.
| Mid-South Investments, Inc. |
| Statesville Flying Service, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv00182 |
| November 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Iredell |
| David S. Cayer |
| Richard Voorhees |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT ordering that: Plaintiff Mid-South Investments, LLC is entitled to judgment against Defendant Statesville Flying Service, Inc. in the amount of $112,000.00 with interest running from the date of filing, 11/10/14 at the rate prescribed by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-5(b); Defendant STATESVILLE FLYING SERVICE, INC. is entitled to $9,000.00 in compensatory damages with pre-judgment interest running from the date of the breach at the statutory rate prescribed by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-5(a) (see Judgment for complete details). Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 7/22/16. (smj)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER directing plf to file a motion to substitute the correct entity. Plf shall also amend its Complaint and/or file an affidavit(s) to make a prima facie showing of complete diversity of citizenship. Plf shall do so by Monday, May 16, 2016, at 4:00 pm. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 5/16/2016. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER denying 33 Motion in Limine subject to specific objection at trial. Other generic types of motions in limine are all denied subject to specific objection at trial. Plf need not respond to this motion. Plf shall respond to 35 Motion in Limine and 37 Motion to Exclude by Friday, May 13, 2016, at 4:00 pm. Dft shall respond to 47 Motion in Limine by Monday, May 16, 2016, at 4:00 pm. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 5/11/2016. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER for peremptory trial setting ( Bench Trial set for Tuesday, 5/17/2016 @ 09:30 AM in Courtroom, 200 W Broad St, Statesville, NC 28677 before District Judge Richard Voorhees). Estimated trial time: 2 days. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 3/3/2016. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Douglas Peter Desjardins for Mid-South Investments, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/26/2015. (cbb) Modified on 8/26/2015 (cbb). Address and e-mail updated. Regenerated NEF.
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/17/2015. (cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mid-South Investments, Inc. v. Statesville Flying Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mid-South Investments, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Pangia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Statesville Flying Service, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Russell Marcoux Racine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
