Fields v. Saul
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Fields
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 5:2019cv00113
Filed: August 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Max O Cogburn
Referring Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM as to Commissioner of Social Security on 9/10/19. (nvc)
September 23, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USM as to US Attorney General on 9/13/19. (nvc)
September 13, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by George Davidson on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Davidson, George)
September 11, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney served on 9/5/2019, answer due 11/4/2019. (ctb)
September 4, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(nvc)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Sealed - Participants) granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 9/4/2019. (nvc)
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY Order of Referral - Social Security. Pursuant to the Standing Order 3:13MC95, 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 72.1 this case is referred to a United States Magistrate Judge to make findings of fact, conclusions of law and to recommend disposition of any dispositive motion filed through submission of a Memorandum and Recommendation to the District Judge. Case referred to Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Entered by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 9/3/2019. (ams)Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
August 30, 2019 NOTICE: Case was filed in wrong division (Asheville), should have been Statesville Division. Case has been copied from 1:19-cv-254 to 5:19-cv-113. Please use 5:19-cv-113 for all future pleadings. (ejb)
August 29, 2019 Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb)
August 29, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Fields. (Hall, Charlotte) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/30/2019 with .pdf reflecting correct case number). NEF Regenerated. (ejb)
August 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Jeffrey Fields.(Hall, Charlotte) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/30/2019 with .pdf reflecting correct case number). NEF Regenerated. (ejb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fields v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: George Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Fields
Represented By: Charlotte Williams Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?