Lail et al v. Central Telephone Company
| Mull's Motel, Inc., Fairbrook Ridge, LLC, Lynn Mull Lail and Graham Leroy Lail |
| Central Telephone Company doing business as Centurylink |
| 5:2020cv00093 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Kenneth D Bell |
| David Keesler |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan: Discovery due by 4/30/2021. Motions due by 6/4/2021. Mediator Designation deadline set for 11/2/2020. Mediation deadline set for 4/30/2021. Jury Trial set for 11/15/2021 09:30 AM in Courtroom, 200 W Broad St, Statesville, NC 28677 before District Judge Kenneth D. Bell. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/4/2020. (nvc)
|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan (Culpepper, Paul) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand (First Amended Complaint) by Central Telephone Company.(Wall, Frank) |
| NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 9/14/2020. (nvc) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Certificate of Settlement Conference Pursuant to Standing Order 5:19-mc-5. Result: Unable to resolve. (Wall, Frank) (Main Document 7 replaced on 8/19/2020) (nvc). |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Central Telephone Company (Wall, Frank) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fairbrook Ridge, LLC, Graham Leroy Lail, Lynn Mull Lail, Mull's Motel, Inc. (Culpepper, Paul) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Central Telephone Company answer due 8/24/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/17/2020. (nvc)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Central Telephone Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of TIme to Respond to Amended Complaint)(Wall, Frank). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank Marshall Wall on behalf of Central Telephone Company d/b/a Centurylink (Wall, Frank) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Catawba County Superior Court, case number 19 CVS 2939. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4577490), filed by Central Telephone Company d/b/a Centurylink. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-State Court Notice of Removal)(Wall, Frank) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (tmg) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (tmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
