Walker v. Saul
| Muranda Walker |
| Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 5:2020cv00195 |
| December 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Graham Mullen |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42:405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew M. Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM285s)(brl) |
Filing 3
SEALED ORDER (Sealed - Case Participants) granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/7/2021. (brl) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/7/2021, NEF Regenerated) (tmg).
|
| Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (hms) |
| NOTICE: Case was filed in wrong division. Case has been copied from 1:20-cv-370 to 5:20-cv-195. Please use 5:20-cv-195 for all future pleadings. (hms) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Muranda Walker. (Hall, Charlotte) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/14/2020 with .pdf reflecting correct case number 5:20-cv-195) NEF regenerated. (hms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Muranda Walker.(Hall, Charlotte) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/14/2020 with .pdf reflecting correct case number 5:20-cv-195) NEF regenerated. (hms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
