Ruddy et al v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ruddy and Latoya Daniels
Defendant: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Case Number: 5:2021cv00118
Filed: August 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Kenneth D Bell
Referring Judge: David S Cayer
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2021 Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC. (Denton, Lee). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC's answer due 10/13/2021. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/9/2021. (DLG)
August 12, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC. (Denton, Lee). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC's answer due 9/13/2021. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/12/2021. (DLG)
August 6, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC (Denton, Lee)
August 6, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Iredell County, NC, case number 21 CVS 1819. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0419-5154008), filed by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - General Action Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Complaint)(Denton, Lee)
August 6, 2021 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (tmg)
August 6, 2021 Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (tmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruddy et al v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ruddy
Represented By: Patrick M. Wallace
Represented By: Scott C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoya Daniels
Represented By: Patrick M. Wallace
Represented By: Scott C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Patton
Represented By: Lee D. Denton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?