Keaton v. Iredell County Government et al
| Karen A. Keaton |
| Iredell County Government, Kyle Broome, Lisa McBroom and Sean Ecckles |
| 5:2022cv00129 |
| September 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Kenneth D Bell |
| David Keesler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 9/30/2022. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mek) |
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case with prejudice; granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and directing the Clerk to terminate this action. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 9/30/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mek)
|
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The order was served conventionally. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (tlj) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally by US Mail (tlj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Karen A. Keaton. (tlj) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand, filed by Karen A. Keaton.(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
