Pitman v. Vogel Law Firm et al
| David Pitman |
| Vogel Law Firm and John Brakke |
| 1:2012cv00103 |
| July 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Southwestern Office |
| Burleigh |
| Charles S. Miller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 6/20/2013 at 10:00 AM in Bismarck Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting 29 Stipulation. Pretrial deadlines shall be amended as follows. Discovery due by 8/15/2013. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 9/1/2013. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 10/1/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 12/15/2013. The court shall conduct a Mid-Discovery Status Conference on 6/17/2013 at 10:00 AM by telephone. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/1/2014 at 1:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 11/6/2012 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
