Branch v. XTO Energy, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Charles Branch
Defendant: XTO Energy, Inc., Ross Eriksmoen, Inc., Petroleum Experience, Inc. and Allan Kolden
Case Number: 1:2016cv00010
Filed: January 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Office: Western Office
County: Burleigh
Presiding Judge: Daniel L. Hovland
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Miller
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 73 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jesse E. Sater. (BG)
June 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 68 AMENDED ORDER: The parties have until 6/12/2017 to show cause why this case should not be consolidated with case no. 1:16-cv-15 for trial. Initial disclosures due by 7/17/2017. Dispositive Motions due by 8/1/2018. Parties may immediately commence with discovery. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (Amended to Correct Scrivener's Error) (BG)
June 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 62 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Breton T. Leone-Quick. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorney on 6/13/2017 (cjs).
May 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr granting 47 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mackenzie Mango. (ZE) Regenerated NEF to Attorney Mackenzie Mango on 5/9/2017. (rh)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/28/2017 at 1:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. (BG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Branch v. XTO Energy, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Branch
Represented By: Jared Walter Gietzen
Represented By: Mark V. Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XTO Energy, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ross Eriksmoen, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Petroleum Experience, Inc.
Represented By: William J. Behrmann
Represented By: Paul R. Sanderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allan Kolden
Represented By: William J. Behrmann
Represented By: Paul R. Sanderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?