Missouri River Royalty Corporation v. Haustveit et al
| Missouri River Royalty Corporation |
| Blaine R. Haustveit and Lincoln Energy Partners II, LLC |
| 1:2018cv00151 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Western Office |
| Williams |
| Daniel L Hovland |
| Charles S Miller |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Counterclaim #12 by Missouri River Royalty Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Bender, Lawrence) |
Filing 13
ORDER, (dispositive Motions due by 9/20/2019, Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2018 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr. Chambers will initiate the call) by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(GD)
|
| Deadlines Terminated. Dispositive Motions deadline of 9/20/2019 is TERMINATED. Inadvertently scheduled prematurely. (rh) |
| DOCKET CORRECTION re: #12 Answer and Counterclaim. Clerk's office added descriptions to attachments. (cjs) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Sander Kopseng and against Missouri River Royalty Corporation by Blaine R. Haustveit, Lincoln Energy Partners II, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Mineral and Royalty Deed, #2 Exhibit 2-Emails, #3 Exhibit 3-Email, #4 Exhibit 4-Recorded Affidavit, #5 Exhibit 5-Email)(Porter, Jordan) Modified on 8/21/2018 to add exhibit descriptions(cjs). |
|
Filing 11
(Text Only) ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland and referring to Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr no longer the presiding judge assigned to the case by Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland.(rh)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Blaine R. Haustveit, Lincoln Energy Partners II, LLC. (rh) |
|
Filing 9
(Text Only) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall have until 8/20/2018 to file an answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. (BG)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Missouri River Royalty Corporation. (rh) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Missouri River Royalty Corporation. (Bender, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Blaine R. Haustveit. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 8/7/2018. (as) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Blaine R. Haustveit, Lincoln Energy Partners II, LLC. (Porter, Jordan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Blaine R. Haustveit, Lincoln Energy Partners II, LLC. (Porter, Jordan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Missouri River Royalty Corporation. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 8/1/2018. (cjs) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Lincoln Energy Partners II, LLC. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 8/1/2018. (cjs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Lincoln Energy Partners II, LLC from Williams County District Court, case number 53-2018-CV-00988. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 118001249. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-Affidavit of Service (Lincoln Energy Partners), #3 Exhibit 3-Affidavit of Service (Haustveit), #4 Exhibit 4-State Court Filings, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
