Frederick v. Social Security Administration
| Thomas Frederick |
| Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv00234 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Clare R Hochhalter |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Thomas Frederick. (mf) (Main Document 7 replaced on 2/2/2021 to remove extra page) (mf). Regenerated on 2/2/2021 (mf). |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Social Security Administration. (jb) Modified on 1/25/2021 to correct defendant (lf). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah E. Wall on behalf of Social Security Administration (Wall, Sarah) Modified on 1/25/2021 to correct defendant (lf). |
| Filing 4 SECOND NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Thomas Frederick. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 1/11/2021. (cjs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mf) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Thomas Frederick. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 12/29/2020. (mf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Filing fee $402, receipt number 121000221) filed by Thomas Frederick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mf) Modified on 1/25/2021 to correct defendant (lf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
