Verlinde v. Commissioner of Social Security
Paul Steven Verlinde |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
1:2022cv00019 |
January 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
Clare R Hochhalter |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONSENT/REASSIGNMENT FORM by Paul Steven Verlinde. (rh) |
Filing 6 SECOND NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Paul Steven Verlinde. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 3/9/2022. (jb) |
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney Edward A. Wicklund (Filing fee $150, receipt number: ANDDC-2350646) by Paul Steven Verlinde. (Attachments: #1 ECF Registration Form)(Wicklund, Edward) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/31/2022 to a corrected version with a signature. (sj). Modified on 1/31/2022 to add receipt number. NEF Regenerated. (sj). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Paul Steven Verlinde. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 2/14/2022. (jb) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402, receipt number 122000350) filed by Paul Steven Verlinde. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Appeals Council Notice, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.