ONEOK Bakken Pipeline, L.L.C. et al v. Carstensen Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff: ONEOK Bakken Pipeline, L.L.C. and ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C.
Defendant: Carstensen Contracting, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00129
Filed: July 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Presiding Judge: Clare R Hochhalter
Referring Judge: Daniel M Traynor
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 3/7/2023 at 01:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter.(LC)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order for Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Deadlines. Two business days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, counsel must email the Final Pretrial Statement; Exhibit List and Witness List for each party; and Expert Reports to: ndd_J-Hochhalter@ndd.uscourts.gov. Trial Memorandum due at least 7 days prior to trial. Deposition designations due at least 14 days prior to trial. Additional deposition designations by opposing parties due 7 days prior to trial. Objections to deposition designations due 4 days prior to trial. Jury Instructions due at least 7 days prior to trial. Motions in limine due 30 days prior to trial. Additional deadlines and details contained in the Order. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/1/2024 at 01:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter.(LC)
September 12, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Hearing: Jury Trial set for 4/15/2024 at 09:30 AM in Bismarck Courtroom 1 before Judge Daniel M. Traynor (7 days). (LC)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. Discovery due by 7/7/2023. Discovery Motions due by 7/14/2023. Plaintiff(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 8/4/2023. Defendant(s) Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports due by 9/8/2023. Plaintiff(s) Rebuttal Expert Disclosures due by 10/13/2023. Defendant(s) Rebuttal Expert Disclosures due by 10/13/2023. Discovery Depositions of Expert Witnesses due by 12/15/2023. Join Additional Parties due by 11/1/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 2/3/2023. Nondispositive Motions due by 4/3/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 10/6/2023.(LC)
September 12, 2022 Filing 8 (Text Only) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter: Scheduling Conference held on 9/12/2022. (LC)
August 26, 2022 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ONEOK Bakken Pipeline, L.L.C. identifying ONEOK, Inc. as corporate parent and ONEOK Pipeline Holdings, L.L.C., ONEOK Partners Intermediate Limited Partnership, ONEOK ILP GP, L.L.C. ONEOK Partners, L.P., ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., and ONEOK Unit Holdings, Inc. as other affiliates; Corporate Disclosure Statement by ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C. ONEOK, Inc. as corporate parent and ONEOK Rockies Investment, L.L.C., ONEOK Partners Intermediate Limited Partnership, ONEOK ILP GP, L.L.C. ONEOK Partners, L.P., ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., and ONEOK Unit Holdings, Inc. as other affiliates (Forward, Robin) Modified on 8/29/2022 to add corporate information. Regenerated NEF. (jb).
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2022 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. By Magistrate Judge Clare R. Hochhalter. (BG)
August 11, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Carstensen Contracting, Inc..(Hughes, John)
August 11, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John C. Hughes on behalf of Carstensen Contracting, Inc. (Hughes, John)
July 28, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONEOK Bakken Pipeline, L.L.C., ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C.. Carstensen Contracting, Inc. served on 7/28/2022, answer due 8/18/2022 (Forward, Robin)
July 27, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Carstensen Contracting, Inc.. (jb)
July 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carstensen Contracting, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 100000201) filed by ONEOK Bakken Pipeline, L.L.C., ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ONEOK Bakken Pipeline, L.L.C. et al v. Carstensen Contracting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ONEOK Bakken Pipeline, L.L.C.
Represented By: Robin Wade Forward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C.
Represented By: Robin Wade Forward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carstensen Contracting, Inc.
Represented By: John C. Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?