Clark v. Bertsch
Petitioner: Branden T. Clark
Respondent: Leann K Bertsch
Case Number: 3:2012cv00002
Filed: January 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of North Dakota
Office: Southeastern Office
County: Stutsman
Presiding Judge: Ralph R. Erickson
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Klein
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER ADOPTING 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss; and denying 26 Motion for Hearing by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 7 Motion for Release from State Custody; and dismissing without prejudice 1 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (State) by Chief Judge Ralph R. Erickson.(SH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Bertsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Branden T. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Leann K Bertsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?