Klein v. Pringle

Petitioner: Chad M Klein
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Case Number: 3:2018cv00140
Filed: July 6, 2018
Court: North Dakota District Court
Office: Eastern Office
County: Stutsman
Presiding Judge: Alice R Senechal
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
July 6, 2018 4 NOTICE of Direct Assignment as to Chad M Klein. Consent/Reassignment Form due by 7/20/2018. (lf)
July 6, 2018 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Chad M Klein. (lf)
July 6, 2018 2 MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (State) by Chad M Klein. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(lf)
July 6, 2018 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chad M Klein. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Account and Assets)(lf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klein v. Pringle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chad M Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?