Phenomenon Licensing v. MySpace Inc.
Phenomenon Licensing |
MySpace Inc. |
1:2008cv00691 |
March 20, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Trademark Office |
Cuyahoga |
Dan Aaron Polster |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1114 Trademark Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Memorandum of Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to remand and denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion not to consolidate as there is no other case with which this case can be condolidated (Related Doc # 6 ).Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 6/6/2008.(B,B) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Phenomenon Licensing v. MySpace Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Phenomenon Licensing | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MySpace Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.