Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Miguel Ortiz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2009cv00700
Filed: March 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Social Security: HIA Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Peter C. Economus
Presiding Judge: Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:402 Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Report and Recommendation that the Agency's final determination that S.O.'s disability has ended and, therefore, benefits should cease be affirmed. Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/6/2010. (S,L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel Ortiz
Represented By: Louise H. Mosher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lynne H. Buck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?