Boldizsar v. Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc.

Defendant: John Doe 1 through John Doe III and Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kathleen Boldizsar
Case Number: 1:2012cv03098
Filed: December 21, 2012
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Gaughan
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boldizsar v. Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1 through John Doe III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc.
Represented By: J. Randall Engwert
Represented By: Cory D. Catignani
Represented By: Robert M. Anspach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Boldizsar
Represented By: Patrick T. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?