Shieldmark, Inc. v. Insite Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff: Shieldmark, Inc.
Defendant: Insite Solutions, LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv00572
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Donald C Nugent
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2014 Filing 31 True copy of mandate from the USCA for the Federal Circuit: Affirming the District Court's decision re #26 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 2014-1177). Date issued as mandate 11/20/14; Costs: $300.33 against the appellant (H,SP)
March 12, 2014 Filing 29 Transcript of Motion Hearing held on October 22, 2013 before Judge Donald C. Nugent. To obtain a bound copy of this transcript please contact court reporter Sue Trischan at 216-357-7087. [28 pages] Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Parties requesting that privacy information be redacted must file a notice of intent to redact with the court by 3/19/2014. Redaction Request due 4/2/2014. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/14/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/10/2014. (T,S)
January 23, 2014 Transcript Order received by court reporter Sue Trischan. Estimated number of pages: 35. Transcript Order received on 1/16/2014. Financial arrangements made on 1/17/2014. Estimated completion date is 3/6/2014. (T,S)
January 15, 2014 Filing 28 Transcript Request by Shieldmark, Inc. for proceedings held on 10/22/2013 before Judge Donald C. Nugent, re #26 Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter: Sue Trischan. Transcript required for appeal. (Pangrace, Martin)
December 27, 2013 Filing 27 Acknowledgment from the USCA for the Federal Circuit of receipt of #26 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 14-1177). Date filed in USCA 12/23/13. (H,SP)
December 19, 2013 Filing 26 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the #23 Memorandum Opinion and Order and #24 Judgment of 11/20/13, filed by Shieldmark, Inc.. (Filing fee of $505 paid, receipt number 0647-6331047) (Pangrace, Martin). Modified text on 12/20/2013 (H,SP).
November 26, 2013 Filing 25 Report on the Determination [Closing] of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120). (K,Ca)
November 20, 2013 Filing 24 Judgment Order granting defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (ECF # 58 in case number1:12 CV 223, and ECF #16 in case number 1:13 CV 572. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant, InSite, and these cases are dismissed. Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA)
November 20, 2013 Filing 23 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (ECF # 58 in case number 1:12 CV 223, and ECF #16 in case number 1:13 CV572). Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant, InSite, and these casesare dismissed. Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA)
October 22, 2013 Filing 22 Minutes of proceedings before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Hearing held 10/22/13 on parties motions for summary judgment. Court to rule. Trial, if necessary, 12/16/13 at 8:30 a.m. (Court Reporter: Sue Trischan) Time: 60 minutes.(C,KA)
October 18, 2013 Filing 21 Reply to response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by All Defendants. Related document(s) #16 . (Weber, Ray) Modified text 10/23/2013 (C,KA).
October 14, 2013 Filing 20 Opposition to #16 Motion for summary judgment of Non-Infringement filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Serra Expert Report Exhibit 54 (Doc #19-2))(Pangrace, Martin)
October 14, 2013 Filing 19 Notice of Filing Deposition Transcript of Expert Jerry M. Serra, PH.D. filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Expert Serra Deposition Transcript, #2 Exhibit 2 - Expert Serra Deposition Exhibit 54)(Pangrace, Martin)
September 30, 2013 Filing 18 Minutes of proceedings before Judge Donald C. Nugent.Status Conference held on 9/30/13. Trial to proceed as scheduled on 12/16/13 at 8:30 a.m. Oral Argument set 10/22/2013 at 08:30 AM.Time: 30 minutes. (C,KA)
September 11, 2013 Filing 17 Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by All Defendants. Related document(s) #16 . (Weber, Ray)
September 11, 2013 Filing 16 Motion for summary judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Defendant Insite Solutions, LLC. (Weber, Ray)
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order Jury Trial set for 12/16/2013 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 17A before Judge Donald C. Nugent. (C,KA)
July 18, 2013 Filing 14 Transfer Order. This case is returned to the Clerk for reassignment to Judge Donald Nugent for all further proceedings. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 7/18/13. (P,R)
July 18, 2013 Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case. Judge Dan Aaron Polster terminated. (C,BA)
July 16, 2013 Minute Order [non-document] of Case Management Conference held on 7/11/13. Case has not been assigned to a track at this time. Time: 1 hr. The Court adopts the schedule outlined in section 3a of the #13 the Parties' Planning Report. Telephone Conference set for 11/12/2013 at 02:30 PM on the Court's bridge line, Claim Construction hearing to be held on 3/26/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 18B beore Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 7/16/13. (P,R)
July 8, 2013 Filing 13 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting , parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Pangrace, Martin)
July 3, 2013 Filing 12 Initial Disclosures filed by All Plaintiffs. (Pangrace, Martin)
July 2, 2013 Filing 11 Initial Disclosures of Defendant, InSite Solutions, LLC filed by All Defendants. Related document(s) #9 .(Weber, Ray)
June 14, 2013 Filing 10 Reply to Counterclaim #8 filed by All Plaintiffs. (Pangrace, Martin) Modified on 6/19/2013 (C,KA).
June 4, 2013 Notice [non-document]: Case management conference rescheduled for 7/11/2013 at 1:00 PM at Chambers 18B before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. (P,R)
May 31, 2013 Filing 9 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order. Case management conference to be held on 7/10/2013 at 9:00 AM at Chambers 18B before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 5/31/13. (P,R)
May 24, 2013 Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaim against Plaintiff Shieldmark, Inc. filed by Insite Solutions, LLC. (Weber, Ray) Modified text on 5/24/2013 (B,B).
April 29, 2013 Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by All Plaintiffs. (Pangrace, Martin) Modified on 5/2/2013 (C,KA).
April 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] denying Defendant Insite Solutions, LLC's Motion to Consolidate Cases (Related Doc #6 ). Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 4/16/13.(M,M)
April 12, 2013 Filing 6 Motion to consolidate cases and Brief in Support filed by Defendant Insite Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. PATENT NO. 8,088,480, #2 Exhibit U.S. PATENT NO. 8,343,292, #3 Exhibit CLAIM COMPARISON)(Weber, Ray)
March 27, 2013 Filing 5 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service, #2 Complaint for Patent Infringement, #3 Exhibit 1 to Complaint for Patent Infringement)(Pangrace, Martin)
March 18, 2013 Filing 4 Notice of Filing Form AO 120 filed by Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Form AO 120 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action regarding a Patent or Trademark, #2 Complaint for Patent Infringement, #3 Exhibit 1 to Complaint for Patent Infringement)(Pangrace, Martin) Modified text on 3/22/2013 (B,B).
March 18, 2013 Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Insite Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (C,BA)
March 18, 2013 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (C,BA)
March 18, 2013 This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (C,BA)
March 18, 2013 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge McHargh. (C,BA)
March 15, 2013 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by All Plaintiffs. (Pangrace, Martin)
March 15, 2013 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand for Patent Infringement against All Plaintiffs. Filing fee paid $ 350, Receipt number 0647-5886529 Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:12-cv-00223-DCN. Filed by Shieldmark, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Patent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Pangrace, Martin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shieldmark, Inc. v. Insite Solutions, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shieldmark, Inc.
Represented By: Mark B. Cohn
Represented By: W. Scott Harders
Represented By: Martin J. Pangrace
Represented By: Susan L. Gragel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Insite Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Mark L. Weber
Represented By: Ray L. Weber
Represented By: Laura J. Gentilcore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?