Brown v. Tibbals
Petitioner: Christopher Lamar Brown
Respondent: Terry Tibbals
Case Number: 1:2013cv00906
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: James G. Carr
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order. The Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) is adopted as the Order of this Court; and petition dismissed. I decline to grant a Certificate of Appealability, as the petitioner did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Judge James G. Carr on 1/22/2015. (G,D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Tibbals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Lamar Brown
Represented By: David L. Doughten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Terry Tibbals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?