Richey et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Paul Richey and Gloria Richey |
Citimortgage, Inc. and Reimer, Arnovitz, Chernek & Jeffrey Co., LPA |
1:2013cv01452 |
July 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Richland |
James S. Gwin |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/13/14. The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant CitiMortgage's motion for summary judgment, dismisses with prejudice plaintiffs' claims against CitiMortgage and dism isses without prejudice CitiMortgage's counterclaim for want of jurisdiction. Plaintiffs having represented that their claims against the Reimer law form have been settled, the Court dismisses this action in its entirety. (Related Doc. 73 ) (M,G) |
Filing 56 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/8/13. The Court grants Defendant CitiMortgage's 16 Motion to dismiss. The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiffs' claims under the FDCPA against CitiMortgage for failure to state a claim and dismisses without prejudice the remaining claims against CitiMortgage and CitiMortgage's counterclaim for want of jurisdiction. The Court also grants in part and denies in part Defendant Reimer's 22 Motion to dismiss. The Court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs' fraud claim against Reimer for failure to state a claim.(S,HR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.