Pleasant Mattress Company v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
| Pleasant Mattress Company doing business as Spring Air California |
| FFP Holdings, LLC, Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc., Carpenter Company, Woodbridge Foam Corporation, Flexible Foam Products, Inc., Flexible Foam Products LLC, Scottdel, Inc., Foamex Innovations, Inc., Future Foam, Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Leggett & Platt Inc. |
| 3:2013pf10011 |
| October 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Jack Zouhary (MDL2196) |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
Order of case closing per the attached Order of termination of multidistrict litigation filed in the master docket, MDL 2196, 1:10md2196, document no. 2114. Signed by Judge Jack Zouhary on 11/2/2016. (R,Sh)
|
|
Filing 15
Order of Dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff's claims against Carpenter Company. Related document #12 . Signed by Judge Jack Zouhary (MDL2196) on 12/30/2014. (K,K)
|
| Filing 14 Stipulation of Dismissal (originally filed on master docket) filed by Pleasant Mattress Company. Related document(s) #13 . (K,K) Modified text 12/24/2014 (K,K). |
| Filing 13 See #15 Order. Proposed Order of Dismissal of claims against Carpenter (originally filed on the master docket) filed by Pleasant Mattress Company. (K,K) Modified text 12/24/2014, 1/7/2015 (K,K). |
| Filing 12 Proposed Stipulation filed by Pleasant Mattress Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lynch, James) |
| Filing 11 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Foamex Innovations, Inc.. (Ryan, Peter) |
| Filing 10 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company. (McGuire, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Mohawk Industries, Inc.. (Bonder, Teresa) |
| Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Flexible Foam Products, Inc.. (Millard, Kendall) |
| Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Woodbridge Foam Corporation. (Kop, Allison) |
| Filing 6 Answer and Affirmative Defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Future Foam, Inc. (Blinn, Meghan) Modified on 12/2/2013 (S,R). |
| Filing 5 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Leggett & Platt Inc.. (Janchar, Jeanne) |
| Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Carpenter Company. (Lukitsch, Bethany) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons issued for service upon Carpenter Company, Flexible Foam Products, Inc., Foamex Innovations, Inc., Future Foam, Inc., Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Leggett & Platt Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc., Woodbridge Foam Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons) (S,J) |
| Filing 2 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons . filed by Pleasant Mattress Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons Flexible, #2 Summons Foamex, #3 Summons Leggett, #4 Summons Hickory Springs, #5 Summons Carpenter, #6 Summons Woodbridge, #7 Summons Mohawk, #8 Summons Future Foam)(Tompkins, Charles) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Pleasant Mattress Company d/b/a Spring Air California. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-6230812. Filed by Pleasant Mattress Company d/b/a Spring Air California. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tompkins, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
