Pleasant Mattress Company v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
Plaintiff: Pleasant Mattress Company
Defendant: Foamex Innovations, Inc., Scottdel, Inc., Flexible Foam Products, Inc., Woodbridge Foam Corporation, Carpenter Company, Domfoam International, Inc., Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Future Foam, Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Leggett & Platt Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013pf10011
Filed: October 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Jack Zouhary (MDL2196)
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pleasant Mattress Company v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foamex Innovations, Inc.
Represented By: Peter M. Ryan
Represented By: Francis P. Newell
Represented By: Lezlie Madden
Represented By: Kevin T. Kerns
Represented By: F. Brenden Coller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scottdel, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flexible Foam Products, Inc.
Represented By: Rachel K. Steinhofer
Represented By: Michael D. Mustard
Represented By: Kendall Millard
Represented By: Larry A. Mackey
Represented By: Bradley R. Love
Represented By: Kathleen M. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woodbridge Foam Corporation
Represented By: Daniel G. Swanson
Represented By: Cynthia E. Richman
Represented By: Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Represented By: Allison C. Kop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carpenter Company
Represented By: Bethany G. Lukitsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Domfoam International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Valle Foam Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company
Represented By: Matthew P. McGuire
Represented By: Michael R. Hoernlein
Represented By: Frank A. Hirsch, Jr.
Represented By: Heather B. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Future Foam, Inc.
Represented By: Edward G. Warin
Represented By: John P. Passarelli
Represented By: Matthew S. Noren
Represented By: Meghan M. Blinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Allison S. Thompson
Represented By: Matthew L. Dowell
Represented By: Teresa T. Bonder
Represented By: Randall L. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leggett & Platt Inc.
Represented By: Jeanne M. Janchar
Represented By: Laurie A. Novion
Represented By: Peter J. O'Shea
Represented By: Joseph M. Rebein
Represented By: Daniel R. Warncke
Represented By: Chad R. Ziepfel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pleasant Mattress Company
Represented By: Charles E. Tompkins
Represented By: James P. Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?