West v. LaRose

West v. LaRose

Petitioner:	Terrell West
Respondent:	Christopher LaRose
Case Number:	1:2014cv00316
Filed:	February 13, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Presiding Judge:	James R. Knepp
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 19, 2017	Filing 35 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies Petitioner's Application for a Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 33 and Motion to Appeal in forma pauperis (ECF No. 34 ) without prejudice to refiling in the pending Sixth Circuit case. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/19/2017. (JLG)
March 24, 2015	Filing 24 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23 ) is overruled. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20 ) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopte d and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6 ) is granted. Terrell West's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed as time-barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2244. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/24/2015. (JLG)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 19, 2017

Filing 35 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies Petitioner's Application for a Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 33 and Motion to Appeal in forma pauperis (ECF No. 34 ) without prejudice to refiling in the pending Sixth Circuit case. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/19/2017. (JLG)

March 24, 2015

Filing 24 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23 ) is overruled. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20 ) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopte d and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6 ) is granted. Terrell West's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed as time-barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2244. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/24/2015. (JLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: West v. LaRose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Terrell West
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Christopher LaRose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?