Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Victorio C Rodriguez
Defendant: United States of America, Charles Moore and Murray D. Altose
Case Number: 1:2014cv02526
Filed: November 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: James S. Gwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/15/25 granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. (Related Doc. 44 ) (M,G)
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/4/15. The Court grants defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's expert witness statement and denies plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's pending summary judgment motion. (Related Docs. 46 , 47 )
August 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/24/15. The motion to dismiss with prejudice by the United States of America is denied. The Court orders plaintiff will not be permitted to offer his own testimony in affidavits or by trial testimony until he submits to a deposition under oral examination by moving defendant. Finally, the Court grants defendant's request for fees in the amount of $87.60 associated with the attempted deposition. (Related Doc. 40 ) (M,G)
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/23/15 denying the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant United States of America. (Related Doc. 6 ) (M,G)
July 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/15/15 granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants Altose and Moore. Plaintiff's claims against said defendants are dismissed. (Related Doc. 5 ) (M,G)
July 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/14/15 denying plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Related Docs. 14 , 22 ) (M,G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victorio C Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murray D. Altose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?