Linetsky v. City of Solon et al.
| Yury Linetsky |
| City of Solon, Michael Gantt, Keith Kulak, Kristi Harvey, Bayan Linetsky-Gliner, John and/or Jane Does and Marina Gliner |
| 1:2016cv00052 |
| January 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/23/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants defendants City of Solon, Michael Gantt, Keith Kulak, and Kristi Harvey's motion for summary judgment as to all § 1983 claims. The Court further grants in part and denies in part defendants Bayan Linetsky-Gliner and Marina Gliner's motions for summary judgment. (Related Docs. 44 , 45 and 58 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
86
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/20/16 denying defendant Marina Gliner's motion to exclude any expert report or testimony by William D. Evans for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 48 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
70
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/28/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, denies the motions to quash the subpoena and for a protective order and orders Cuyahoga County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Ronni Ducoff to submit to a deposition and produce the requested documents. (Related Doc. 39 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
