Ruhl et al v. State of Ohio Department of Health et al
||Nicola Ruhl and Gary Ruhl
||State of Ohio Department of Health, Richland County Board of Developmental Disabilities and Wendy Grove
||March 30, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||James S. Gwin
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Education
|Cause of Action:
||20 U.S.C. § 1401
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 13, 2017
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/13/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, affirms the hearing examiner's decision, denies plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, and denies plaintiffs' motion to strike. (Related Docs. 48 , 49 , and 56 ) (D,MA)
|October 7, 2016
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/7/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, denies plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, denies plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration and declines to certify its previous Order for immediate appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), and denies plaintiffs' motion to supplement the record. (Related Docs. 16 , 29 , and 37 ) (D,MA)
|July 26, 2016
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/26/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' Rehabilitation Act § 504, Americans with Disabilities Act, Title II, procedural due process, and equal protection violation claims and grants defendants' motion to dismiss the state law claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court denies plaintiffs' motion to strike as moot. (Related Docs. 10 and 15 ) (D,MA)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?