Spaude et al v. Mysyk et al
| Thomas W. Spaude, Angela M. Spaude and Dennis C. Macieski |
| Paul Mysyk, Harrison Schumacher, Quantum Energy, LLC, Quaneco, LLC, Phillips Murrah, P.C., Robert O'Bannon, Beverly Vilardofsky and Thomas Wolfe |
| 1:2016cv01836 |
| July 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Geauga |
| Donald C. Nugent |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
Order Adopting 87 Report and Recommendation and denying 58 plaintiffs' motion to vacate judgment and for leave to amend complaint (other related docs 63 , 64 , 89 ). Judge Donald C. Nugent 2/28/2018 (C,KA)
|
|
Filing
51
Memorandum Opinion adopting Report and Recommendation 46 in its entirety. The motion to dismiss 9 filed by defendants O'Bannon and Vilardofsky is granted in part. All of plaintiffs' claims against defendants O'Bannon and V ilardofsky are dismissed with prejudice. If plaintiffs wish to pursue default, they must file a motion for default judgment, an affidavit re service and damages, and a proposed final default judgment order no later than Friday, 10/6/2017 (other related docs 37 , 38 , 39 and 43 , 44 , 45 ). A Default Judgment Hearing set for 10/25/2017 at 10:30 AM. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 9/21/2017 (C,KA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
