Meldon v. Village of Chagrin Falls et al
||Village of Chagrin Falls, Picone Company, Inc., Thomas Brick, David B Bloom, Ben Himes and Harry Edwards
||August 19, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||Donald C. Nugent
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1441
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 8, 2017
Memorandum Opinion granting defendant Picone Company's Motion for Summary Judgment 34 . The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Village Defendants 33 ishereby granted in part and denied in part. The Village's Motion is g ranted only with regard to the requirement that Mr. Meldon first file a State mandamus action prior to filing his wrongful taking claim with this Court. The Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby denied on all other grounds. Mr. Meldon's taking s claim is not ripe for review and is hereby dismissed without prejudice, as to all remaining Defendants, with the right to refile following the completion of State mandamus proceedings, if necessary. Likewise, all remaining claims against all rema ining Defendants are hereby dismissed without prejudice, with the right to refile following the completion of State mandamus proceedings, if necessary. All pending motions are hereby terminated. This case is hereby terminated. Judge Donald C. Nugent 9/8/17(C,KA)
|October 18, 2016
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 5 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 10/18/2016. (M, S)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?