Johnson v. Clipper
||Reginal L. Johnson
||April 11, 2017
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||Thomas M. Parker
||Benita Y. Pearson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 19, 2019
Memorandum Opinion and Order Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service. Objections to the Report were, therefore, due on 3/6/2019. Neither party has filed any su ch objections. Any further review would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Reginal L. Johnson's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 will be dismissed. The Court certifies that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate ofappealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/19/2019. Related document(s) 9 , 12 . (S,Ke)
|November 21, 2017
Memorandum of Opinion and Order Adopting 9 Report and Recommendation. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7 ) as to Ground One of the Petition is granted, or, in the alternative, Petitioner's motion to amend (ECF No. 10 ) so as to remove Ground One is granted. In either case, only Ground Two remains before the Court. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/21/2017(C,KA)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?