Payne v. Sloan
Petitioner: Tyler Seth Dustin Payne
Respondent: Brigham Sloan
Case Number: 1:2018cv00302
Filed: February 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Ashtabula
Presiding Judge: Christopher A. Boyko
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Parker
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 62 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 54 ); DISMISSES Petitioner's Grounds for Relief as either procedurally default and/or meritless; and DENIES the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ). The Court finds an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Since Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right directly related to his conviction or custody, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/14/21. (S,HR)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 61 Opinion and Order. Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 51 ) to the Magistrate's Order (Doc. 49 ) are OVERRULED. Petitioner's Motions to Expand (Doc. 55 ) and for Permission for Electronic Filing Access (Doc. 60 ) are DENIED. Petitioner must submit his objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 54 ) by 3/30/2021. Failure to file objections within this specified time may waive the right to appeal any adverse Order. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/2/21.(S,HR)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Opinion and Order: Petitioner's Motion for an Extension of Time to Object (Doc. 26 ) is MOOT and therefore DENIED. Petitioner's Objection to the Magistrate's decision (Doc. 27 ) is GRANTED in part, as follows: Petitioners objection is OVERRULED with respect to Items Three through Nine; SUSTAINED with respect to Item Eleven; OVERRULED with respect to his Motion to Appoint Counsel; and MOOT with respect to the timeline for filing his Traverse. Respondent shall file the requested document in Item Eleven within thirty days after the date of this Order. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 1/16/2020.(D, I)
July 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order denying Petitioner's 8 Motion for an Order granting Petitioner Exemption Status pursuant to Section (9) of the Electronic Public Access Fee Schedule, and 9 Motion for leave to file documents with the court via facsimile transmission or electronic mail. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 7/10/2018. (D,JJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Sloan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tyler Seth Dustin Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brigham Sloan
Represented By: Mary Anne Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?