Goff v. Eppinger et al
| John Thomas Goff |
| LaShaunn Eppinger, Ronald Armbruster, Ronald Smith and Michael Davis |
| 1:2018cv00671 |
| March 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Lorain |
| James S. Gwin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/12/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, dismisses the § 1983 First Amendment retaliation claim under Rule 12(b)(6), and dismisses without prejudice the § 1983 Fir st Amendment free exercise claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on ripeness grounds. With respect to the Fourteenth Amendment § 1983 claims, the Court dismisses the substantive due process claim pursuant to §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A, and dismisses without prejudice the procedural due process and equal protection claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on ripeness grounds. The Court therefore need not consider whether granting the permanent injunction is appropriate, and dismisses the action. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. (Related Docs. 1 and 10 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
7
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/26/18. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Eppinger, Armbruster, and Davis are dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). His claims against all defendants under the Religious Land Us e and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1, are also dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. The Clerk's Office shall forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshals for service of process upon defendant Smith. (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
4
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/30/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, denies plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this order file an amended complaint. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. (Related Docs. 1 and 2 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
