Kance v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Michael Kance |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 1:2018cv01898 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| John R Adams |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon U.S. Attorney on 8/22/18; Commissioner of Social Security Administration by FedEx on 8/22/18 and upon Attorney General by FedEx on 8/22/18 filed on behalf of Michael Kance. Related documents #1 , #6 . (W,CM) |
| Filing 6 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshals for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/17/2018. (D,JJ) |
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/17/2018. (D,JJ)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 8/16/2018. (O,K) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Michael Kance. Related document(s) #1 . (Margolius, Marcia) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP pending. Filed by Michael Kance. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons Regional Chief Counsel SSA, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 USM-285 US Attorney, #6 USM-285 Attorney General, #7 USM-285 Regional Chief Counsel SSA) (Margolius, Marcia) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 8/16/2018. (O,K) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (O,K) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (O,K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kance v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Lisa Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Kance | |
| Represented By: | Marcia W. Margolius |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
