Menefee, Jr., v. Pinkeny et al
| Marvin Menefee, Jr. |
| Kenneth Mill, Cuyahoga County Sheriffs and Clifford Pinkeny |
| 1:2018cv02152 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Motion for access to legal law research. Filed by Plaintiff Marvin Menefee, Jr. (W,Jo) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint filed by Marvin Menefee, Jr. Related document(s) #1 . (W,Jo) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Cuyahoga County Sheriffs, Kenneth Mill, Clifford Pinkeny. Filing fee not paid. Filed by Marvin Menefee, Jr. (W,Jo) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (W,Jo) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (W,Jo) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. A copy of the Complaint and a blank Civil Cover Sheet was sent to Marvin Menefee, Jr. on 9/19/18. (W,Jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
