NetTemps, LLC v. JobsInLogistics.com, Inc et al
NetTemps, LLC |
JobsInLogistics.com, Inc and Don Firth |
1:2018cv02260 |
September 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by NetTemps, LLC. JobsInLogistics.com, Inc waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018 filed on behalf of NetTemps, LLC (Blake, Jason) |
Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by NetTemps, LLC. Don Firth waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018 filed on behalf of NetTemps, LLC (Blake, Jason) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Timothy F. Sweeney filed by on behalf of Don Firth, JobsInLogistics.com, Inc. (Sweeney, Timothy) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. No summons provided, no summons issued. (D,Ky) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (D,Ky) |
Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (D,Ky) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by NetTemps, LLC. (Blake, Jason) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8934195.. Filed by NetTemps, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Asset Purchase Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Blake, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.