Noco Company v. Apex Golf Carts, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Noco Company
Defendant: Caius Griu and Apex Golf Carts, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv02815
Filed: December 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order of Dismissal with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and court costs. (Related document #4 ). Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 12/18/2018. (K,K)
December 18, 2018 Filing 6 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Apex Golf Carts, Inc. dba Biigmoe on 12/13/2018, filed on behalf of Noco Company Related document(s) #3 . (P,WL)
December 18, 2018 Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Caius Griu on 12/13/2018, filed on behalf of Noco Company Related document(s) #3 . (P,WL)
December 18, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Noco Company. (Malone, Sean)
December 7, 2018 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Apex Golf Carts, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70111570000182092073. (W,Jo)
December 7, 2018 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Caius Griu placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70111570000182092066. (W,Jo)
December 6, 2018 Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR)
December 6, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Noco Company. (Pinney, Jon)
December 6, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9040201. Filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reseller Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's sales on eBay, #3 Exhibit C - Cease and Desist Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons, #6 Summons) (Pinney, Jon)
December 6, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,SR)
December 6, 2018 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (S,SR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noco Company v. Apex Golf Carts, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noco Company
Represented By: Sean P. Malone
Represented By: David R. Posteraro
Represented By: Jon J. Pinney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caius Griu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apex Golf Carts, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?