Branch County, Michigan v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Branch County, Michigan |
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt PLC, Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc., Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Watson Laboratories Inc., Allergan PLC, Cardinal Health Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Actavis LLC, Kroger Co., Cephalon Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc., Walgreen Co., Purdue Pharma Inc, Allergan Finance LLC, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Walmart Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, CVS Indiana, L.L.C., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Noramco Inc, SpecGX LLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. |
1:2018op46096 |
September 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Michigan Western. Case number 1:18-cv-00983. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; certified copy received from Northern District of Ohio; case transferred to Northern District of Ohio under MDL No. 2804, National Prescription Opiate Litigation (pjw)[Transferred from miwd on 9/25/2018.] |
Filing 4 COPY of CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation directed to the Northern District of Ohio regarding case to be transferred to the Multidistrict Litigation Panel under MDL No. 2804, National Prescription Opiate Litigation (pjw) [Transferred from miwd on 9/25/2018.] |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (pjw) [Transferred from miwd on 9/25/2018.] |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan Finance LLC, Allergan PLC, Amerisourcebergen Corporation, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, CVS Indiana, L.L.C., Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, McKesson Corporation, Noramco, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc., Specgx LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Kroger Co., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walgreen Eastern, Co., Walmart Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. (none provided) (pjw) [Transferred from miwd on 9/25/2018.] |
Filing 2 Memorandum regarding potentially related case returned to Clerk from Magistrate Judge Green indicating that this case is related to 1:17-cv-1114 (jlb) [Transferred from miwd on 9/25/2018.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Branch County, Michigan (Esser, Lisa) [Transferred from miwd on 9/25/2018.] |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Branch County, Michigan in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4223056 (Esser, Lisa) [Transferred from miwd on 9/25/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.