MLO Properties LLC v. City of Cleveland
Plaintiff: MLO Properties LLC
Defendant: City of Cleveland
Case Number: 1:2019cv01226
Filed: May 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Pamela A Barker
Referring Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth M. Crook filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Crook, Elizabeth)
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 8/26/2019 at 02:15 PM at Chambers 16A before Judge Pamela A. Barker. Signed Judge Pamela A. Barker on 07/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties Planning Meeting)(L,Ja)
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (L,Ja)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 7/10/19. For purposes of clarification, the parties are advised that the Court's Order dated 7/2/19 was intended to terminate any upcoming telephonic and/or in-person conferences and hearings set by the previously assigned district judge. All other case management deadlines (including pleading amendment, discovery, expert, briefing, and dispositive motions deadlines) remain in effect. In addition, any referrals to the assigned Magistrate Judge (including for mediation and/or settlement conferences) remain in effect. Any status, final pre-trial and trial dates set to take place before the previously assigned district judge will be reset at a later date. (S,G)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 First Amended complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, Restoration of Real Property, Compensatory Damages, Punitive Damages, and Attorney's Fees and Costs, Pursuant to 42 USC 1983, et seq. against City of Cleveland. Filed by MLO Properties LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Aerial Map, #2 Exhibit B - Trust Communication, #3 Exhibit C - Trust Communication, #4 Exhibit D - Trust Communication, #5 Exhibit E - Communication with City, #6 Exhibit F - Communication with City, #7 Exhibit G - Communication with City, #8 Exhibit H - Communication, #9 Exhibit I - Communication) (McIntyre, Robert)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 7/2/19. All deadlines and hearings set by the previous District Judge are terminated and will be reset forthwith.(D,MA)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Case reassigned to Judge Pamela A. Barker pursuant to General Order 2019-13. (B,R)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Motion for extension of time until 7/28/2019 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant City of Cleveland. (Kretch, Wesley)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. City of Cleveland answer due 7/29/2019. Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 6/25/2019.(K,K)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon City of Cleveland on 6/6/2019, filed on behalf of MLO Properties LLC Related document(s) #3 . (S,KM)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to City of Cleveland placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70161970000041091002. (B,R)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon City of Cleveland. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by MLO Properties LLC. (McIntyre, Robert)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, Restoration of Real Property, Compensatory Damages, Punitive Damages, and Attorney's Fees and Costs, Pursuant to 42 USC 1983, et seq. against City of Cleveland. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9333834.. Filed by MLO Properties LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Aerial Map, #2 Exhibit B - Trust Communication, #3 Exhibit C - Trust Communication, #4 Exhibit D - Trust Communication, #5 Exhibit E - Communication with City, #6 Exhibit F - Communication with City, #7 Exhibit G - Communication with City, #8 Exhibit H - Communication, #9 Exhibit I - Communication, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Summons) (McIntyre, Robert)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (B,R)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (B,R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MLO Properties LLC v. City of Cleveland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Cleveland
Represented By: Wesley M. Kretch
Represented By: Elizabeth M. Crook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MLO Properties LLC
Represented By: Robert W. McIntyre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?