Zimmer v. Turner
Petitioner: Leo A. Zimmer
Respondent: Warden Neil Turner
Case Number: 1:2019cv01412
Filed: June 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kathleen B Burke
Referring Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2019 Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Mary Anne Reese filed by on behalf of Neil Turner. (Reese, Mary)
July 1, 2019 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order: Respondent shall file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the filing of Respondent's Return of Writ to file a Reply (Traverse). Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond thereto . (S,HR) Modified text on 7/29/2019 (S,HR).
July 1, 2019 Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) mailed to Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost at 30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215; Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order, and #3 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to Warden Neil Turner and Petitioner Leo A. Zimmer at North Central Correctional Complex, P.O. Box 1812, Marion, Ohio 43301 on 7/1/19. (S,HR)
June 21, 2019 Copy of Automatic Reference of Administrative Action mailed to Leo A. Zimmer (#684-988) and Neil Turner, Warden, at North Central Correctional Complex, P.O. Box 1812, Marion, OH 43301 on 6/21/2019. (K,K)
June 21, 2019 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Entered on behalf of Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 6/21/2019. (K,K)
June 19, 2019 Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Y,A)
June 19, 2019 Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid. $5.00. Receipt # 14660115113. Filed by Leo A. Zimmer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit, #3 Affidavit, #4 Brief of Appellant, #5 Court of Appeals Opinion, #6 Application for Reopening, #7 Court of Appeals Opinion, #8 Motion to Reconsider/Application to Reopen, #9 Motion for New Trial, #10 Motion for Leave to File Delayed Appeal, #11 Supreme Court Notice of Appeal, #12 Supreme Court Documents) (Y,A)
June 19, 2019 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (Y,A)
June 19, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (Y,A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zimmer v. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Neil Turner
Represented By: Mary Anne Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leo A. Zimmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?