Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
| Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation of Montana and Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation |
| Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, WalMart, Inc., f/k/a/ Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc., McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and Walgreen Co. |
| 1:2019op45364 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation; Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation of Montana against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9347969. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action MDL No. 2804. Filed by Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation of Montana, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Hudson, Jenna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
