County of Jim Wells v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
| County of Jim Wells |
| Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation, Walgreen Co, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., CVS Pharmacy Inc., Mallinckrodt PLC, Endo Health Solutions Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Purdue Pharma Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corporation, Allergan PLC, Walmart Stores Inc., Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, Watson Laboratories Inc., Actavis plc, Allergan Finance LLC, Watson Pharma, Inc. and Actavis Inc |
| 1:2019op45884 |
| October 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28:1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Texas Southern. Case number 4:19-cv-03580. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Interdistrict transfer to Northern District of Ohio. Case transferred electronically. (lgouadi, 4) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 9 JPML CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-114) transferring case to Northern District of Ohio to be included in MDL Docket No. 2804. (lgouadi, 4) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
Filing 8
ORDER entered: CVS's motion to stay, (Docket Entry No. 6), is granted. The motion to remand, (Docket Entry No. 5), is denied, without prejudice to reassertion.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.]
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM In Support of re: #6 MOTION to Stay Pending Likely Transfer to Multidisrict Litigation by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Torian, Mark) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Pending Likely Transfer to Multidisrict Litigation by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Torian, Mark) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand by County of Jim Wells, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Henderson, Jay) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 4 Corrected MOTION for Confidential Treatment of file earlier as "agreed" which was not correct( Motion Docket Date 10/24/2019.), Corrected MOTION for Entry of Order re: Motion to Remand by County of Jim Wells, filed. (Henderson, Jay) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion by CVS Healthcare Corporation for a Temporary Stay Pending Transfer, filed by County of Jim Wells. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fibich, Kenneth) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED IN ERROR. MOTION to Remand by County of Jim Wells, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fibich, Kenneth) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 152nd District Court, Harris County, case number 201949073 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23226017) filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Torian, Mark) [Transferred from txsd on 10/23/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
