Liberty Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc., et al. v. Ford Motor Company
| Liberty Ford Lincoln Canton, LLC and Liberty Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 1:2020cv01951 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1221 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
Order approving #26 Stipulation of Dismissal. The claims of Plaintiffs are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/19/21. (S,HR)
|
| Filing 26 Proposed Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed by All Plaintiffs. (Panza, Richard) |
| Minutes of proceedings [non-document] before Judge Christopher A. Boyko. Telephone Status Conference held 11/3/21. All parties represented. The parties notified the Court that they have reached an agreement to resolve the case. Therefore, the Settlement Conference scheduled for 11/4/2021 is CANCELLED. The parties shall notify the Court once a Settlement Agreement is executed by all parties. Time: 10 Minutes. (S,HR) |
|
Order [non-document]. Status Conference set for 11/3/2021 at 10:30 AM to be held telephonically before Judge Christopher A. Boyko. The Court will host the conference call and inform counsel by way of separate email of the telephone number for the conference call. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/2/21. (S,HR)
|
| Filing 25 Answer to #24 Amended complaint for Declaratory Relief, a Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, and Money Damages, filed by Ford Motor Company. (Ellis, Robert) |
| Filing 24 Amended complaint for Declaratory Relief, a Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, and Money Damages, against Ford Motor Company. Filed by Liberty Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc., Liberty Ford Lincoln Canton, LLC. (Panza, Richard) |
| Filing 23 Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Answers to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Second Set of Interrogatories and Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Second Requests for Production filed by All Plaintiffs. (Theado, Thomas) |
|
Order [non-document] GRANTING IN PART the Parties' Motion for Amended Scheduling Order (Doc. #22 ). Schedule is reset as follows: the parties have until 7/30/2021 to amend the pleadings; Non-Expert Discovery Cut-off is 10/8/2021; and the Settlement Conference is reset for 11/4/2021 at 2:00PM. Additional dates will be set after the Settlement Conference if necessary. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/8/2021.(L,Ja)
|
| Filing 22 Joint Motion for Entry of First Amended Scheduling Order filed by Liberty Ford Lincoln Canton, LLC, Liberty Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.. Related document(s) #12 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Amended Scheduling Order)(Panza, Richard) |
|
Filing 21
Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 6/28/2021. (S,S)
|
| Filing 20 Proposed Order Protective Order filed by Ford Motor Company. (Ellis, Robert) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Service of Plaintiffs Answers to Defendant Ford Motor Companys First Interrogatories and Plaintiffs Responses to Defendant Ford Motor Companys First Requests for Production filed by All Plaintiffs. (Theado, Thomas) |
| Filing 18 Minutes of proceedings before Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. Telephone Conference held on 6/7/2021. The parties discussed Defendant's proposed protective order. An in-person status conference is set for Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 2:00 p.m., in Chambers 10B. Clients may attend telephonically if necessary. (Court Reporter: n/a) (Time: 25 min.) (S,S) |
| IMPORTANT: Notice of Hearing [non-document]. Telephone Conference set for 6/7/2021 at 12:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. The Court will provide counsel, via email, with instructions on accessing the conference call. (Related document(s) #16 , #15 , #17 ) (S,S) |
|
Filing 17
Order referring #15 Motion for Protective Order filed by Ford Motor Company to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg for report and recommendation. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/17/21. (S,HR)
|
| Filing 16 Response to #15 Motion for protective order filed by All Plaintiffs. (Panza, Richard) |
| Filing 15 Motion for protective order filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit A-Proposed Protective Order, #3 Exhibit B-Declaration of Greg Beauchamp, #4 Exhibit C-Declaration of Robert Clements, #5 Exhibit D-Plaintiffs' Discovery Requests, #6 Exhibit E-April 26, 2021-Proposed Redlined AEO Protective Order, #7 Exhibit F-April 27, 2021-Emails from Plaintiffs' Counsel, #8 Exhibit G-Protective Order-Higginbotham v Ford (District of South Carolina), #9 Exhibit H-Protective Order-New Jersey Coalition v Ford (Superior Court of New Jersey-Mercer County), #10 Exhibit I-Protective Order-Dahl v Ford (Western District of Wisconsin), #11 Exhibit J-Protective Order-Crain v Ford (Arkansas Circuit Court-Pulaski County), #12 Exhibit K-Ganley v Mazda (Northern District of Ohio), #13 Exhibit L-Protective Order-Willoughby v Mazda (Court of Common Pleas-Lake County, Ohio), #14 Exhibit M-Protective Order-Brooks Automotive v General Motors (Eastern District of Pennsylvania))(Ellis, Robert) |
| Minutes of proceedings [non-document] before Judge Christopher A. Boyko. Telephone Conference held on 4/15/21. All parties in attendance. Potential discovery issue brought to the Court's attention. Parties shall provide a Joint Status Report concerning the dispute on or before 4/26/2021. The Report should be sent to Court staff, whose email has been provided to the parties. All dates remain as scheduled for now. (Time: 15 minutes.) (S,HR) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Service of Plaintiffs Liberty Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.'s and Liberty Ford Lincoln Canton, LLC's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, and Requests for Admission to Defendant Ford Motor Company filed by All Plaintiffs. (Theado, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 Court's Standing Order For Settlement Conferences. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/18/2020. (D, I) |
|
Order [non-document] setting the following Case Management Dates: Case is set for the Standard Track. Telephonic Status Conference is set for 4/15/2021 at 2:00PM. Call-in information will be circulated prior to the conference. The parties have until 6/23/2021 to Amend Pleadings. Non-Expert Discovery cutoff is 7/9/2021. Settlement Conference set for 7/21/2021 at 2:00 PM in Chambers 328 before Judge Christopher A. Boyko. Settlement Conference Order to follow. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/18/2020. (D, I)
|
|
Order [non-document]granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Robert H. Ellis for Ford Motor Company. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #10 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/18/2020.(D, I)
|
| Filing 12 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and L.R. 16.3(b) - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Panza, Richard) |
| Filing 11 Joint Consent to Electronic Service filed by All Plaintiffs. (Panza, Richard) |
| Filing 10 Motion for attorney Robert Hugh Ellis to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10434012, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing)(McNellie, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Ford Motor Company. (McNellie, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Ford Motor Company. (McNellie, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Ford Motor Company on 9/12/2020, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #6 . (L,Br) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Ford Motor Company placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 71603901984871603922. (J,FE) |
| Filing 6 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Ford Motor Company. (J,G) |
| Filing 5 Supplement to Complaint - Summons in a Civil Action, filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Panza, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons provided did not include second page. Did not issue. (Y,A) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by All Plaintiffs. (Panza, Richard) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by All Plaintiffs. (Panza, Richard) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Declaratory Relief, a Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, and Money Damages with jury demand against Ford Motor Company. Filing fee paid $400, receipt number AOHNDC-10230375. Filed by Liberty Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc., Liberty Ford Lincoln Canton, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Panza, Richard) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (Y,A) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
