MD Auto Group, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.
| MD Auto Group, LLC doing business as I-90 Nissan |
| Nissan North America, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv02248 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Certified Copy of State Court Documents received from Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. (R,AP) |
| Filing 7 Response in Opposition to #6 Motion to remand case Defendant Nissan North America's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Nissan North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Chronowski Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2, June 3 2020 NNA Letter, #3 Exhibit 3, September 2 2020 NNA Letter, #4 Exhibit 4, Cuyahoga County Transfer Order, #5 Exhibit 5, October 30 2020 Nissan Notice of Filing, #6 Exhibit 6, Lorain Common Pleas Docket Sheet, #7 Exhibit 7, Lorain County Order)(Birnbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Motion to remand case filed by Plaintiff MD Auto Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit with Exhibits 1-3)(DeVito, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Answer to Complaint #1 filed by Nissan North America, Inc. (Birnbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. for Nissan North America, Inc. filed by Nissan North America, Inc.. (Birnbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 3
Order: This matter was removed to this Court on October 6, 2020. For the convenience of the Court, and by no later than October 20, 2020, the parties are directed to refile herein any motions that were previously filed in state court and which remained pending at the time of removal. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/6/2020. (L,Ja)
|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,MI) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV20937108 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number AOHNDC-10321479. Filer has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action CV20937108. Filed by Nissan North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, State Court Filings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Birnbaum, Daniel) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MD Auto Group, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MD Auto Group, LLC doing business as I-90 Nissan | |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. DeVito |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel R. Birnbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
