Johnson, et al v. Parker-Hannifin Corporation, et al
Matthew Collaro and Michael D. Johnson |
John Does 1-14, The Board of Directors for Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Parker Total Rewards Administration Committee, Parker-Hannifin Corporation, The Human Resources and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors for Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Board of Directors for Parker-Hannifin Corporation, John Does and Human Resources and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors for Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
1:2021cv00256 |
February 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Christopher A Boyko |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Michael D. Johnson, Matthew Collaro. Board of Directors for Parker-Hannifin Corporation waiver sent on 2/12/2021, answer due 4/13/2021; Human Resources and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors for Parker-Hannifin Corporation waiver sent on 2/12/2021, answer due 4/13/2021; Parker Total Rewards Administration Committee waiver sent on 2/12/2021, answer due 4/13/2021; Parker-Hannifin Corporation waiver sent on 2/12/2021, answer due 4/13/2021 filed on behalf of Michael D. Johnson; Matthew Collaro (Doles, Troy) |
Order [non-document] granting #3 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Troy A. Doles for Matthew Collaro and Michael D. Johnson. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 2/2/21.(S,HR) |
Order [non-document] granting #2 Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Sean E. Soyars for Matthew Collaro and Michael D. Johnson. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 2/2/21.(S,HR) |
Financial Transaction in the amount of $402.00 received from Schlichter, Bogard & Denyon, LLP. Receipt # 14660129136 (M,MT) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid.. Filed by Michael D. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Parker Total Rewards, #3 Summons - The Human Resources and The Compensation Committee, #4 Summons - The Board of Directors, #5 Summons - Parker-Hannifin Corporation, #6 Envelope) (M,MT) |
Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (M,MT) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (M,MT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.