Lumpkin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Angela Lumpkin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv00481
Filed: March 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: J Philip Calabrese
Referring Judge: Jonathan D Greenberg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon the U.S. Attorney on 3/12/2021; Office of the Regional Chief Counsel on 3/16/2021 by FedEx; the U.S. Attorney General on 3/15/2021 (marked c-19) by FedEx, filed on behalf of Angela Lumpkin. Related document(s) #6 . (L,Br)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Original Summons and USM-285 issued to U. S. Marshal on 3/10/2021 for service upon Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, and Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (S,S)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 3/10/2021. (S,S)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 3/10/2021. (S,S)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,MT)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge J. Philip Calabrese on 03/01/21. (M,MT)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Judge J. Philip Calabrese assigned to case. (M,MT)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (M,MT)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Angela Lumpkin. (Wilson, Rachel)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Angela Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to SSA, #3 Summons to Atty General, #4 Summons to Asst. US Atty for ND of Ohio, #5 USM-285 to SSA, #6 USM-285 to Atty General, #7 USM-285 to Asst US Atty for ND of OH) (Wilson, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lumpkin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Lumpkin
Represented By: Rachel C. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?