Clarke v. Jack Cleveland Casino LLC et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Clarke
Defendant: Glenda Torres, Lance Lehman and Jack Cleveland Casino LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv01011
Filed: May 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2021 Minutes of proceedings [non-document] before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Zoom conference held on 6/14/21. Plaintiff Christopher Clark participated and was represented by Attorney Angela Rodriguez. Lawrence Lehman and General Counsel Allyson Miller participated for defendants and were represented by Attorneys Morena Carter and Ryan Morley. Andy Bosh participated on behalf of defendants' insurer. The Court discussed the facts of the case and the parties' desire to resolve the dispute through mediation. All parties consented to Judge Polster serving as mediator. The Court will conduct the mediation via Zoom on Monday August 2, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. All parties and attorneys, including the individual defendants and the insurance representative are required to participate. Zoom information will be sent at a later date. The Court requested that defendants respond to plaintiff's current itemized offer by Monday June 21, 2021. The Court also ordered the parties to exchange mediation statements and to file a joint status report, including the parties' latest demands and offers, by 4:00pm on Wednesday July 28, 2021. (Court Reporter: n/a.)Time: 30 minutes. (W,CM)
June 10, 2021 Filing 9 Initial Disclosures filed by All Plaintiffs. (Rodriguez, Angela)
June 10, 2021 Filing 8 Initial Disclosures filed by Jack Cleveland Casino LLC, Lance Lehman, Glenda Torres. Related document(s) #5 .(Carter, Morena)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Order . [non-document] Defendant's motion to excuse (ECF Doc. #6 ) is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Defendant Glenda Torres is excused from appearing at the video CMC on June 14, but defendants' insurance representative must attend. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered on behalf of Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 6/9/21.(W,CM)
June 8, 2021 Filing 7 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Rodriguez, Angela)
June 7, 2021 Filing 6 Motion to Excuse Attendance at Case Management Conference filed by Jack Cleveland Casino LLC, Lance Lehman, Glenda Torres. Related document(s) #5 . (Carter, Morena)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 6/14/2021 at 01:00 PM at to be held by video conference (Cleveland) before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting due no later than 12:00 p.m. on 6/10/2021. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 5/24/21. (W,CM)
May 21, 2021 Filing 4 Answer to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Jack Cleveland Casino LLC, Lance Lehman, Glenda Torres. (Carter, Morena)
May 14, 2021 Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (L,Ja)
May 14, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Jack Cleveland Casino LLC. (Carter, Morena)
May 14, 2021 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, case number CV 21 946359 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $402, receipt number AOHNDC - 10833346. Filed by Glenda Torres, Jack Cleveland Casino LLC, Lance Lehman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Morena L. Carter, #2 Exhibit A - Summons & Compliant, #3 Exhibit B - Court Docket, #4 Exhibit C - to Declaration of Morena L. Carter - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carter, Morena)
May 14, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,Ja)
May 14, 2021 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (L,Ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clarke v. Jack Cleveland Casino LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenda Torres
Represented By: Morena L. Carter
Represented By: Ryan J. Morley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lance Lehman
Represented By: Morena L. Carter
Represented By: Ryan J. Morley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Cleveland Casino LLC
Represented By: Morena L. Carter
Represented By: Ryan J. Morley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Clarke
Represented By: Angela L. Rodriguez
Represented By: Brian D. Spitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?