Boyd-Bey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Kennetta Boyd-Bey
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv01247
Filed: June 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Referring Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2021 Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until October 25, 2021 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of J. Rasputnis, #2 Proposed Order)(Asher, Ruchi)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Defendant Commissioner's motion to extend the time to file an answer and administrative transcript until October 25, 2021 (ECF Doc. #6 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/16/2021. (D,JJ)
June 29, 2021 Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
June 29, 2021 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 6/29/2021. (D,JJ)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Kennetta Boyd-Bey's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 6/29/2021. (D,JJ)
June 25, 2021 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,MT)
June 25, 2021 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kennetta Boyd-Bey. (Wilson, Rachel)
June 25, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Kennetta Boyd Bey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilson, Rachel)
June 25, 2021 Judge John R. Adams assigned to case. (M,MT)
June 25, 2021 Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (M,MT)
June 25, 2021 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 06/25/21. (M,MT)
June 25, 2021 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (M,MT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd-Bey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kennetta Boyd-Bey
Represented By: Rachel C. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?