Dawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sue Dawson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2021cv01756
Filed: September 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Pamela A Barker
Referring Judge: Jonathan D Greenberg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Related document(s) #1 . (Asher, Ruchi)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (S,S)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 9/30/2021. (S,S)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 9/30/2021. (S,S)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Certificate Confirming Notification of Case Information filed by Sue Dawson. (Meadows, Mary)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,Ja)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Sue Dawson, o/b/o N.B., a minor. Related document(s) #1 . (Meadows, Mary)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Sue Dawson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Meadows, Mary)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,Ja)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (L,Ja)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 9/10/2021. (L,Ja)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (L,Ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sue Dawson
Represented By: Mary T. Meadows
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?