Saliba v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Donna Saliba |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 1:2021cv01908 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/28/2021. (D,JJ) |
Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Saliba's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/28/2021. (D,JJ)
|
| Filing 5 Response to #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Donna Saliba. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bank Statements)(Wilson, Rachel) |
|
Filing 4
Order: Plaintiff Saliba shall file a supplement to her application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis no later than October 27, 2021. See Order for details. Related Doc. #2 . Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/13/2021. (D,JJ)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (M,MT) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Donna Saliba. (Wilson, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Donna Saliba. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilson, Rachel) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (M,MT) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (M,MT) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 10/08/21. (M,MT) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (M,MT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Saliba v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donna Saliba | |
| Represented By: | Rachel C. Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Rema Alberta Ina |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
