Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community |
McKinsey & Company, Inc. |
1:2021op45033 |
March 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from Ohio Northern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:21-cv-04489, filed 06/10/2021.Related document(s) #7 . (M,TL) |
Filing 7 Transfer Order by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In re: MDL 2996 McKinsey & Company, Inc., National Prescription Consultant Litigation. Case transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer(P,R) |
Filing 6 Proposed Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Proposed Order Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint)Related document(s) #1 .(Baker, Amanda) |
Filing 5 Notice of Filing With the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Motion to Transfer for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D-1, #5 Exhibit D-2, #6 Exhibit D-3, #7 Exhibit D-4, #8 Exhibit D-5, #9 Exhibit D-6, #10 Exhibit D-7, #11 Exhibit D-8, #12 Exhibit D-9, #13 Exhibit D-10, #14 Exhibit D-11, #15 Exhibit D-12, #16 Exhibit D-13, #17 Exhibit D-14, #18 Exhibit D-15, #19 Exhibit D-16, #20 Exhibit D-17, #21 Exhibit E)(Baker, Amanda) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Amanda K. Baker filed by on behalf of McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Baker, Amanda) |
Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. McKinsey & Company, Inc. waiver sent on 3/4/2021, answer due 5/3/2021 filed on behalf of Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (Avery, Henry) |
Filing 2 Attorney Appearance by Henry J. Avery filed by on behalf of Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. (Avery, Henry) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against McKinsey & Company, Inc.. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-10689169. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:17-md-02804-DAP. Filed by Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Drachler, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Swinomish Indian Tribal Community | |
Represented By: | Dan Drachler |
Represented By: | Henry J. Avery |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Amanda K. Baker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.