McClendon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Katelynn McClendon |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv00906 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| William H Baughman |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 15, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Lisa) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until August 15, 2022 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Commissioner of Social Security Administration answer due 8/15/2022. Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 07/28/22.(M,MT)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 06/02/22. (M,MT)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 06/02/22.(M,MT)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Katelynn McClendon. (Wilson, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Katelynn McClendon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilson, Rachel) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (L,MI) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/31/2022. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McClendon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katelynn McClendon | |
| Represented By: | Rachel C. Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Johnson |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
