Brooks v. Social Security Administration
| Kevin Brooks |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv01904 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Thomas M Parker |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 425 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Transcript of Proceedings before the Social Security Administration filed by Social Security Administration. Related document(s) #1 . (Asher, Ruchi)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Please note: counsel for the parties are under an obligation to meet and confer prior to the filing of plaintiff's reply brief; see the attached order for specific details. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/27/2022. (D,JJ)
|
|
Order [non-document]: Plaintiff Kevin Brooks's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/27/2022. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing 4
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (F,AW)
|
|
Filing 3
Certificate of Compliance filed by Kevin Brooks. (Braun, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Kevin Brooks. (Braun, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Kevin Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial) (Braun, Katherine)
|
|
Notice of Social Security Complaint: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.3.1, the Clerk shall issue this Notice of Electronic Filing to notify the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. No summonses will issue. The certified administrative record shall be filed by the Social Security Administration within 60 days of this Notice. (F,AW)
|
|
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (F,AW)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (F,AW)
|
|
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (F,AW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brooks v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Brooks | |
| Represented By: | Katherine M. Braun |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
